2011 College Football New Uniform Tour: Part Four
Here is the final look at all of the new uniforms worn in college football for 2011.
Click on the links below to view the earlier installments.
I'll wrap everything up with a look at the changes we saw this season with Notre Dame's uniforms.
Enjoy...
South Florida
South Florida debuted these late in the season and they were very quietly one of the most audacious uniforms every worn at the college level. Despite the fact that it's basically the same Wounded Warrior uniform as South Carolina's, the Bulls went all out on this---and it was a mistake.
Rutgers
The Scarlet Knights wore a matte black helmet with a red logo earlier in the season, then switched it up to a white logo later, only to unveil these white domes with American flag logo. Copy-cat design at its worst, folks.
Cincinnati
The Bearcats came out in the Liberty Bowl with matte black helmets, complete with their normal logo on the left side, and Alabama numbers on the right side. Seemingly out of nowhere, this became a huge trend this year.
Ohio
Here's those black uniforms the Bobcat players were so excited about earlier in the season. Even with a white helmet they still look like Hawaii.
Tulsa
Not only did Tulsa get a new home uniform and helmet this year, but they unveiled a psychedelic helmet and an interesting throwback uniform with an even more interesting throwback helmet. That "T" in that position almost looks like more of a punishment than anything else.
Houston
Houston wore throwbacks against Marshall, and wouldn't you know it---they looked really nice.
UCF
Central Florida busted out the gold jerseys that they've worn in the past. Can you imagine how awful Notre Dame would look with a gold helmet added to this? Have we not learned anything from the basketball team? And while we're at it, why does the women's basketball team at Notre Dame think the school colors are black and green?
Southern Miss
I believe Southern Miss started the trend of having a logo on one side of the helmet and a number on the other. This new lid for their bowl game had a new eagle logo (their third of the season) and player number on the other side. Of course it's matte black bro---it's what's in right now!
Boise State
Remember how Boise State was outlawed from wearing all-blue at home this year? Well, they wore orange and then this new gray jersey instead. Solid, Broncos...solid.
Colorado State
Another gold jersey, except this time it looks half decent with white pants. Don't you even think about saying Notre Dame should wear a gold jersey, don't you do it!
TCU
TCU wore these new silver helmets, which look okay. I tend to really like their black and purple helmets a lot so these don't seem as sharp as maybe other believe they are.
Wyoming
Wyoming has a bevy of uniform and helmet combinations nowadays. In addition to having their helmet logo colored in yellow, brown, and white, the Cowboys also sported an American flag edition and a Wyoming state flag edition as seen here. A for effort I suppose, because I love vexillology, but not such a high grade for practical purposes.
Kentucky
How do you beat Tennessee? The answer is easy---black uniforms. At least Kentucky kept their blue helmets so it wasn't a complete black-out. Players will start getting sick of the black uniforms soon, right?
Mississippi State
The Bulldogs wore a bunch of gold trim all over their uniforms including their spikes, numbers, and helmet logo for the Egg Bowl. I really like the undershirt with the player number on it---Notre Dame should do something similar since the monogram is currently on the sleeves.
LSU
It's really tough to beat LSU's normal uniforms so these were bound to look bad in comparison. Overall, it's not terrible, but I can't for the life of me understand why so many jerseys have such stupid looking armpit design. The creator of this idea needs to be fired immediately.
Ole Miss
Ole Miss wore gray jerseys which they've done a few times in the past. Since it's so close to white this look can be pulled off. In this instance it's better to use a dull gray instead of a shiny silver, which the Rebels school colors definitely support.
2011 Season & Notre Dame Review
There has been a growing trend in college football for roughly 10 years that welcomes the sporting of multiple uniform combinations, special helmets, rivalry jerseys, and the like.
Led by Oregon, this new wave of style has been increasing each season and truly separates college football from the more static NFL, where the rules are far stricter and less creative.
Perhaps when we look back 2011 will be a watershed season that saw the greatest variation of uniform style and change---with traditional teams like Michigan and Notre Dame leading the way in kicking down traditional barriers---but in the short term we are likely to see more and more innovation.
For the Fighting Irish, this past season saw a lot of uniform changes and that will be documented below. However, I do expect Notre Dame to return to a much more normal way of doing things over the next few seasons.
I repeat, 2011 will not be the norm.
We'll likely see some tweaks here and there at neutral site games and in the Shamrock Series, but expect to see the Irish in the traditional blue and gold at Notre Dame Stadium and on the road.
Notre Dame opened the season in their traditional home blues, with the only difference from 2010 being the flat gold pants instead of the metallic sets worn since 1986.
Also note, throughout the Brian Kelly era the Irish have almost exclusively worn black socks at home instead of navy blue.
Game 2 brought the entire new throwback Under the Lights uniforms against Michigan. With this change came the shamrock helmet, white jerseys with kelly green numbers and shoulder stripes, old gold pants, long white socks with kelly green stripes, and new white cleats with green trim.
The Irish also introduced a shamrock towel in this game as well (as seen on the Voodoo Child).
After the Michigan game, the Irish settled into their traditional uniforms before bringing out the famous new gold helmets for the USC game.
Half way through the season the Irish had already worn three different helmets.
The Maryland game really brought on some radical changes.
First, a new one-off helmet with a shamrock and dark green facemask was created that had no basis in history. The Irish then paired that new helmet with the green jerseys they've worn since 2005, while bringing back the metallic pants that hadn't been worn all season, long green socks, and the UTL white cleats.
A few players even sported a new flesh-colored undershirt with "Irish" script on the inside of one arm and the fighting leprechaun on the other.
In the last game of the season, the Irish came out with a bowl patch and names on the backs of their jerseys.
You also can see a good view of the leprechaun towel the team had been using all season, as well as the specially made blue/gold/white bowl game cleats (see Motta picking the ball up). Adidas also had the Irish in a new pair of black socks with a bit of an unusual striping pattern on the back.
Finally, Notre Dame also wore three different sets of gloves throughout the 2011 season.
In total, the Irish wore 4 different helmets, 3 different pants, 3 different cleats, 3 sets of gloves, 5 different pairs of socks, and 2 different towels.
We'll see what next year brings, but don't expect such extravagance in 2012.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wanted to liked the uniforms for the Irish-MD game. I really did.
In fact, the individual pieces are all pretty good. Even the crazy bold helmet. Thrown together, it was too much, especially with the various shades of green.
But the undershirts. Good grief. I couldn’t stop laughing during the actual game at how ridiculous they looked. I too thought they were flesh-toned, which made the tattoo effect of the Irishman and the “Irish” script pretty absurd (especially on the smaller-armed players), and which made the undershirts look particularly odd on guys whose flesh tone is not that flesh tone.
I read afterwards, however, that they were supposed to be gold colored (but matte), essentially to match the pants. Bleh on the undershirts.
#figureitoutbobby
You're right the Maryland uniforms were seemingly thrown together
And that effort didn’t pay off.
Unlike you though, I don’t really like any of the individual pieces they used.
1) Still think the helmet looks bad, and would no matter what it is paired with. Just can’t get over that dark green facemask.
2) I’ve never liked these green jerseys and want white numbers in gold trim, not the reverse as it is now.
3) The flesh colored shirts looked awful, and if they were trying to match the pants, why did they go out of their way to wear the metallic gold pants when they hadn’t all season?
4) No huge complaints with the socks or shoes though.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 19, 2012 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
Maryland unis were awful all around.
The weird finish on the helmets belongs in bowling alleys. Maybe without that finish the helmets would have looked cool, but… [throws up in mouth].
by Mouth of the South on Jan 20, 2012 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
not all were awful, some were not bad
but the bad were spectacularly bad
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
I should have been clear--I meant our unis that we wore against Maryland.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 21, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed, those were atrocious, the helmets in particular.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
I am not a fan of the severely cut arm pits with no undershirt
All I know about the fit I learned from puppet Michael Floyd, but the look is….unappealing.
Well hello there hangover. Fancy meeting you here this bright Thursday morning.
I hear ya
But both Adidas and Nike roll with those designs. Not much the team can do, besides maybe ditching the TECH FIT jerseys, which I doubt they’ll do.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 19, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
Pantaloons
I prefer the metallic gold to the flat gold. Would like to see them try old gold at least once in 2012.
The new helmets are glorious. Keep them forever.
I was excited for a turn away from the metallic gold
But the flat gold really disappointed this season. On the other hand, I think the old gold worn for the Michigan is pimp as hell and should be the normal pants.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 19, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
I went to the Michigan game
and I didn’t think the pants were old gold exactly. I think the colors look different in different pictures, but I didn’t notice much of a difference in person. That said, the uniform worn during the Parseghian years is never to be topped.
by blheureux1991 on Jan 19, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
Defining the actual shade of old gold can be tricky
Especially when you try and do it across different teams who all seem to have a different version of old gold.
I do agree that the 2011 old gold isn’t quite what was worn in the 1960’s, but it’s at least in the ballpark.
![]()
Obviously it’s not a drastic color change, but I think it’s enough to make it different and better IMO. The mannequin on the right doesn’t have the new gold helmet either, and he still looks the best!
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 19, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
pants on the left are the best option
middle would be second, right look the worst
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 20, 2012 9:29 AM EST up reply actions
We never agree on any of this
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 9:36 AM EST up reply actions
but I keep hoping you will come around
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 20, 2012 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
I typically want what is in the best interests of Notre Dame
And her glorious tradition :)

Alan Page (and old gold) outta nowhere!!!
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 9:53 AM EST up reply actions
no, you want what you think looks best
as do we all
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 20, 2012 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
I agree. We need the metallic pants to match the helmets as closely as possible.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 20, 2012 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
Too much gold!!!
I like that the matte pants seem to make the gold on the new helmets really pop – I don’t think the helmets would look as awesome with shiny pants, especially ones that came closer to matching their color. Shiny pants with shiny beige helmets was fine because they matched and the helmets didn’t scream “golden dome” – now that they do, I like that the pants are more subtle.
#figureitoutbobby
by fishoutofwater on Jan 20, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
This x100000000000
That has essentially been my argument for years. All of the shiny gold attention should be directed towards the helmets.
Also….
1) Too many teams wear metallic gold pants—-although we have seen a few teams move away from them lately (UCLA, Boston College).
2) A flat color looks tougher than metallic. It is also more traditional looking, which I think is important for Notre Dame’s over look.
3) Nearly every team wants to match their pants and helmet (if they are supposed to be the same color). See UCLA and Colorado for the same problems Notre Dame has had in the past. However, I think there is a certain je ne sais quoi about Notre Dame specifically NOT matching its pants and helmet. That’s largely based around the idea that all of the metallic gold attention should be paid to the helmet, because it is mimicking the actual golden dome.

After all, wouldn’t the dome lose some of its luster if portions of the roof, or the facade, or the doors, were gilded gold too?
With that said, I think the flat “sandstorm” pants used this year are not the answer. And when I see the metallic pants I see FSU, Navy, etc.—-and we’re going to have a devil of a time trying to match a pant color to the new helmets anyway. I really think the old gold used against Michigan would be a great option moving forward.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions
So, are you proposing pants artfully matched to the stone walls of the admin building?
#figureitoutbobby
by fishoutofwater on Jan 20, 2012 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
The horizontal strips hide the stilt legs.
Well hello there hangover. Fancy meeting you here this bright Thursday morning.
by Cranked_Irish on Jan 20, 2012 3:37 PM EST up reply actions
Mix the sandstorm and old gold pants and you'll get a color very similar!
How about that!
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
Disagree
Both that they are gross and that they are mustard.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
I could maybe get behind this.
But I want to see what I’m agreeing to first.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 20, 2012 11:45 PM EST up reply actions
"Nearly every team wants to match their pants and helmet"
There is a reason for that, it looks better.
The darker gold on the right in the pic above is awful. The pants do not have to exactly match the helmet, but it should clash and these pants do that big time.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
should NOT clash it should say
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
Why am I agreeing with LDR so much lately?
Either he is no longer the contrarian, or I am becoming a contrarian, but if that’s the case, wouldn’t we still disagree, because two contrarians aren’t going to agree…. Hmmmm.
Anyway, it’s good to be on the same side as such a passionate advocate.
But yes, if your school’s colors are red and white, and your helmet and pants are red, it’s common sense that they should be the same shade of red. I think our gold helmets and classic unis set us apart. I don’t think we need mismatched, off-gold pants to further distance ourselves from the pack. It’s about being us and doing it well, not being unlike others. You guys make an interesting point about saving the gold for our helmets—i.e. our domes—but I just think that the mismatched pants look bush league. It just looks like a fail—like we’re not good enough to match them, when we certainly are.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 21, 2012 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
The mismatched pants look like the school cannot afford decent unis and are wearing hand-me-downs.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
I agree that the shade of gold in the pants should match the shade of the helmet.
However, the shade can match without them being metallic – that’s a material, textural quality, rather than a color quality. I don’t like the yellow pants. They look yellow, not gold, and clash with the helmet (though I love the rest of the UTL uniform). I do think the shade of the matte pants should be slightly darker and just a tiny bit more yellow to match the shade of the new helmet. And honestly, it’s hard for me to picture a metallic pant that “matches” the new helmet without looking totally ridiculous because the helmet is SO gold – bright and flecked and all that.

#figureitoutbobby
by fishoutofwater on Jan 21, 2012 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
Matching the pants and helmet does look better
But it’s a lot easier when you’re dealing with a color that isn’t gold or a shiny gold that Notre Dame uses.
That’s why Notre Dame’s helmet and pants have never really matched.
And I also don’t think the pants look awful in the least bit, nor did they back in the 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s. Saying it clashes I think is an exaggeration as well.
And like fish said, you’re not going to be able to match the pants to the new helmets anyway, and if you try it’s probably going to look beyond ridiculous.
So bringing it back full circle, if you can’t truly match the two items, then I prefer a more traditional old gold color.
Harumph!
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 21, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions
A team that I think is getting it right
Is UCLA.
They also have Adidas, they dropped the metallic pants, and they got a really nice rich color that looks great instead of ND’s pale sandstorm light, light, light gold.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 21, 2012 9:29 PM EST up reply actions
Let former Irishman Joe Fauria show you

If that’s not the exact same shade as the UTL Michigan pants, it’s very, very close.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 23, 2012 8:15 AM EST up reply actions
For me, for my taste--this s not a close enough match.
If you’re not going metallic, get the right shade of gold.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 23, 2012 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
You can't match
A metallic helmet and a flat gold pant.
And it’s going to be even more difficult with the new helmets.
Seems to me a return to our roots are in order!
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 23, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
Fishoutofwater said this above:
I agree that the shade of gold in the pants should match the shade of the helmet. However, the shade can match without them being metallic – that’s a material, textural quality, rather than a color quality. I don’t like the yellow pants.
Sooo, I was more responding to him with that comment. If you’re not going metallic, go for a more white, less brown shade of gold in the pants.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 23, 2012 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
Just for reference, check out ND's official colors here:
http://onmessage.nd.edu/notre-dame-brand-standards/color/#cprim
Obviously, the pants don’t have to be “Notre Dame gold” (Pantone 117 or metallic 10127), but the shade really is a bit darker than the current standard flat gold pants. It is also less yellow than the UTL uniform pants. A shade that actually approached the official gold color (I actually prefer the lighter flat version of the “metallic” shade) seems like it would be a good fit for the new helmet.
#figureitoutbobby
by fishoutofwater on Jan 24, 2012 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
A+ find there, fish
The current metallic pants and flat sandstorm pants have far too much white in them to come close to those three gold shades offered by the university.
It seems to me that the electric gold (r220 g180 b57) is pretty close to the UTL pants.
I would take any of those colors linked above though. I think it’s important to make the pants darker. The question then becomes do you use more brown or yellow?
Anything to get away from the Bookstore sandstorm light tan.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 24, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
Nice work indeed.
A shade that actually approached the official gold color (I actually prefer the lighter flat version of the "metallic" shade) seems like it would be a good fit for the new helmet.
I could get on board with this. It would not be a dealbreaker.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 24, 2012 4:34 PM EST up reply actions
Nice that we can all come to something closer to consensus on this!
Alert Mr. Swarbrick and the equipment staff immediately.
#figureitoutbobby
by fishoutofwater on Jan 24, 2012 9:22 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, ND's unis in the 50s-70s were not show stoppers
I agree that matching gold is a bit tricky, but you can at least get close, and those old school gold pants do not even come close, total mismatch.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 21, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions
"Overall, it's not terrible, but I can't for the life of me understand why so many jerseys have such stupid looking armpit design."
THANK YOU!
I’ve been thinking this for years. It just looks ridiculous.
by Mouth of the South on Jan 20, 2012 2:23 PM EST reply actions
It's in other sports too unfortunately

Literally makes zero sense.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 20, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
Queue the hockey reference from Murtaugh
Hey, have to give a guy a hard time on his b’day after all
I don't tweet often--but when I do, you can be sure it isn't important.
@jemiesle
'Preciate that sir.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Jan 21, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions

by 











































