Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: FSU To Big 12 'Inevitable,' According To Report

Notre Dame vs. Purdue Preview: Irish Big Favorites in West Lafayette

Notre Dame (-12.5) at Purdue

This Saturday, the Fighting Irish open the month of October with yet another rivalry game. 

At 8 o'clock, Notre Dame rolls into Ross-Ade Stadium to take on the Purdue Boilermakers.

The Irish are seeking their fourth straight victory over Purdue, and a continuation of their short two-game winning streak here in the 2011 season.

Let's preview the Boilermakers.

Star-divide

How Has Purdue Been Doing This Year?

It hasn't been a very good start for the Boilers this season. They come into this game with a 2-1 record but that is against the 181st toughest schedule according to Sagarin's rankings. 

Purdue opened their season against Middle Tennessee State and was trailing late in the fourth quarter before a touchdown pass gave the Boilers the lead with under a minute to play. The Blue Raiders came back down field to try and tie it with a field goal, but their 47-yard attempt was blocked---preserving the victory for Purdue.

In week two, Purdue again struggled with a non-BCS opponent, ultimately losing to the Rice Owls

It was a crushing loss for Purdue, as it was the Owl's first win over a BCS program since 2001 when they beat a 0-11 Duke team. 

The next week, Purdue beat up on FCS opponent Southeast Missouri State 59-0, and have been waiting for the Irish after a bye week since.

Many were expecting the Boilermakers to be one of the weakest teams on the Irish schedule, and despite a 2-1 record, that may very well be the case. For example, Notre Dame has played 4 BCS teams this year and hasn't given up as many yards in one game as Purdue did to Middle Tennessee State.

Notre Dame Defense vs. Purdue Offense

On offense, Purdue returns a decent amount of starters, but just 1 of its top 4 receiving leaders---which also doesn't include Keith Smith who was denied a 14th year of eligibility after missing all but two games last year (25 receptions and 240 yards against Notre Dame the past three years).

At quarterback Purdue will likely start Caleb TerBush, while Robert Marve (who started last year against Notre Dame) should see the field at some point after coming back in week three from a knee injury suffered last season. 

Also in the backfield Purdue has been using a bunch of running backs, but should rely heavily on Ralph Bolden and Akeen Shavers. Bolden is a quality runner who missed all of last year with an injury, while Shavers is a first-year JUCO transfer. They have combined for 409 yards (6.0 YPC) with 5 touchdowns so far this year.

Ralphbolden_display_image_medium

Ralph Bolden missed last year's game against Notre Dame.

On the line Purdue replaced two starters, but has four upperclassmen playing with a lot experience. At right tackle the Boilermakers are starting a sophomore who switched over from defense in the spring. The offensive line doesn't have any stand-outs and has given up 7 sacks so far in their first three games.

Obviously the numbers are inflated due to a horrible schedule thus far this season, but Purdue is currently sitting as the 9th best rushing team in the country. While I think it's obvious that Notre Dame won't be facing one of the best rushing attacks in the country this weekend, I believe the Boilermakers do have a dynamic duo at running back with Bolden and Shavers. 

The problem for Purdue is that Notre Dame has been certifiably stingy on run defense this year, currently sitting as the 25th best team in the land giving up only 93 yards a game, while being one of a handful of teams to play only BCS schools this season.

Purdue would be helped out with a mobile threat at quarterback, but neither TerBush or Marve are going to do much damage. That means the Boilermaker running backs will have to shoulder the load against a Notre Dame defense that has given up only 237 yards on 75 carries and zero touchdowns from opposing running backs this season. 

Purdue's bread and butter has been running the ball, and they will find it difficult to do so this weekend. If they are forced to give up on the run and put the ball in the quarterback's hands, this game could start to get ugly. 

Purdue has been giving up sacks to bad teams and they don't have any proven receiving threats, nor a quarterback who has shown he can put the team on his shoulders. The fact that the Boilermakers will play both TerBush and Marve likely plays into Notre Dame's hands as well.

Notre Dame Offense vs. Purdue Defense

Purdue returns a lot of bodies and starters on defense with a nice mix of experience and youth. They have 4 seniors, 3 juniors, 3 sophomores, and a redshirt freshman in the mix right now.

Up front Purdue will miss All-Big Ten and NFL first round draft pick Ryan Kerrigan in a major way. Now, the end positions are the weakness of the defensive line, but the Boilermakers have two big bodies in Bruce Gaston and Kawann Short up the middle. Short is the star of the front line, coming off a 2nd Team All-Big Ten sophomore season in 2010.

336ffdd4-fd1b-5fbe-ace0-29b13c05d49e

The Irish offensive line will have to deal with Kawann Short.

At linebacker Purdue lacks size in a major way, but all three starters are pretty solid. Dwayne Beckford (Steele 3rd team All-Big Ten) and Joe Holland (4th team All-Big Ten) are capable of causing some problems.

Last year the Boilermakers were terribly inexperienced in the secondary, but in 2011 everyone returns. However, this is still likely the weakest part of the Purdue defense. 

The safeties are nothing to write home about, but sophomore corner Ricardo Allen is a rising star after being a 2nd team freshman All-American last season.

It's safe to say that Purdue's front seven will be decent and stopping the run will definitely be their strength versus stopping the Irish passing game.

Despite limiting Southeast Missouri State to 8 completions and just 66 yards passing, Purdue still sits at 60th nationally in pass defense giving up 212 yards per game. In fact the Boilermakers gave up 572 yards passing and 4 touchdowns combined to both Middle Tennessee State and Rice. 

If Purdue plays better than they have this season, they might be able to keep Notre Dame around 100 yards rushing, but it will be tough to do so. Through the air, Notre Dame should be able to push towards 300 yards if the mistakes and turnovers don't slow them down.

Prediction

It's hard to get a good read on Purdue due to their weak early season schedule, but all signs are pointing to this being one of the bottom three teams in the Big Ten, and possibly the worst team on the Notre Dame schedule. 

That doesn't mean this will be a walk over for the Irish (the Boilermakers' 2009 win over Ohio State should be a stern reminder of that), but there is very little indication that Purdue is even close to being a good football team right now.

First of all, the program has taken a step backward with Danny Hope at the reigns, and you're not likely to get much of an argument from Purdue fans about that. 

The Boilermakers are 11-16 under Hope and just 6-10 in the Big Ten. Additionally, Purdue is 6-13 against BCS teams since Hope was hired and they have lost 7 of their past 9 games leading up to this Saturday's contest against Notre Dame. 

Their 6 wins over the past year and a quarter have come against: Western Illinois, Ball State, Northwestern, Minnesota, Middle Tennessee State, and Southeast Missouri State.

Not good.

Nevertheless, Purdue does have a handful of really good players and the advantage of playing a home game at night where the Irish are just 3-4 inside Ross-Ade Stadium in the post-Holtz era.


For Purdue to win, they will need the Irish to continue their turnover woes while also getting a career performance out of one or two players on their offense. 

But I just don't see Purdue winning this one. They might keep it close, but it would take a really terrible performance (especially on defense) from Notre Dame for the Boilermakers to win.

In a lot of ways, Purdue's offense is similar to Pittsburgh's but the Boilermakers don't have Ray Graham on their team and I think Pitt is a little better coached offensively. And since Graham was kept under control and opponents have had a difficult time running on the Irish this season, Notre Dame should be able to take away Purdue's greatest strength offensively with Bolden and Shavers. 

TerBush has nice numbers this season, but he is the third string quarterback and has never faced a defense like Notre Dame in his career. Marve is more talented, but we don't know how much he will play, and even still, he's pretty inconsistent. 

After last week's performance, it's not hard to to envision Notre Dame struggling offensively for parts of this game, but if they can keep the turnovers down and put points on the board on every redzone opportunity, then the Irish have a chance to put a serious hurting on Purdue.

If Notre Dame remains committed to running the ball for a majority of the game, Cierre Wood and Jonas Gray should be good for 120-140 yards minimum. 

With the offense likely continuing to spurn the hyper-speed attack, even more pressure falls on Tommy Rees to move the ball and put up points. The team can't move into Purdue territory two or three times and come away without points when the slower offense means fewer possessions. 

Also be aware that Purdue has a big-legged kicker in Carson Wiggs who will attempt anything from 50+ yards away---so the Irish can ill afford to get into a game where field goals could be the difference.

This won't be a blowout, but a comfortable win nonetheless. We might see some backups for a series, but I would bet against it.

Notre Dame 34

Purdue 16

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice breakdown

Irish are going to win this game but I’m not getting cocky like last week and saying stuff like…“this game will be over at the half”…“Irish win by 20+” I’m not putting the jinx out there like I did last week….just saying,its another Irish win.

by Bill Rubin on Sep 29, 2011 7:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Early morning comments can get wild and crazy

Just throwing that out there!

IRISH BLOWOUT! IRISH BLOWOUT! IRISH BLOWOUT!

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with you

Last week I told a friend I wanted to be “checking the scores of other games”by the 4th Q.

I was not.

by Huck Finn on Sep 29, 2011 10:19 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

If you have to script this one...

most ND fans would hope for a lead something in the neighborhood of 28-3 halfway through the 3rd quarter so they can start rotating some younger players in the game. I would love to see a lop-sided score, but Purdue seems to play at the level of its opponent and has had the extra week to prepare for the Irish.

Do the Boilermakers have the personnel to copy what Pitt was doing defensively to confuse Rees? Probably not. Nor do they have the passing attack to keep the game within reach late. This could be one of the more dominant games the Irish D will have this year, and it wouldn’t shock me to see them hold Purdue to somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 yds total offense.

I personally would like to see something different on offense from Rees & Company. Maybe a few bootlegs by Rees to plant the seed in future offenses (especially if they flood the opposite side of the field with receivers) and work in more of the underneath passing game. Perhaps the jet sweep to Riddick? We can only hope. I would be happy if they can build a comfortable lead to get a few snaps for Crist and hand the offense over to Hendrix midway through the 4th.

by Jim Miesle on Sep 29, 2011 9:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Maybe a playaction bootleg

When Rees is under center?

Is that allowed in the rule book?

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rees on a boot is the stuff of nightmares

Do you not remember his 2 picks against Michigan? Both off a boot action. He doesn’t look comfortable on those plays, makes bad reads, and throws poorly on the run.

@papaalphakilo
The people who suggest Brian Kelly should not curse are the reason the rest of us created profanities. - Spencer Hall

by PAK on Sep 29, 2011 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe so, but he has to get comfortable with it at some point

I’d like for the call to give him a shorter throw, instead of trying to throw it 20 yards down field.

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let me refine a bit further...

I would like to acutally see him keep the ball and run it for a few yards. He did this once against Pitt and seems to slowly becoming more comfortable with tucking the ball away and running if his first two reads aren’t there. And yes, the backhanded compliment was by design.

Even if he only gains 4-5 yds, you have to chalk that play up as successful. Also, I agree, I don’t want to see him throw the ball on the run either.

by Jim Miesle on Sep 29, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a fan of Rees on the bootleg either

I don’t have any numbers to back me up, but I don’t think Rees have been very good throwing on the run.

by burger23 on Sep 29, 2011 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Numbers or not

You’re right. Remember last week when he missed a wide open Riddick with space ahead of him. The throw wasn’t even close.

by Chris Schumerth on Sep 29, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

He did hit Riddick with a beautiful throw later though

Not sure if he was rolling out, though I thought he was.

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's what I want to see:

STOP TURNING THE BALL OVER.

A win would be nice, too.

by burger23 on Sep 29, 2011 9:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Based on the pattern I am seeing

The Irish will have one turnover. If they generate three or four on defense, I think we can live with that…maybe.

by Jim Miesle on Sep 29, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

And that one turnover should be a deep bomb overthrow to Floyd

That is the best turnover I can think of.

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Probably better than a Turk punt

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Sep 29, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes!

I think this one goes well for us. Cleaner offensively with plenty of points. I also expect the D to have a very nice game. A stress free viewing experience would be a very nice change of pace.

by whiskey OFD on Sep 29, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

The pundits at ESPN

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/48272/page/picks/predictions-big-ten-week-5

One has Purdue scoring 17, the other 24. Does anyone really see the Boilermakers scoring that much? Nice research ESPN…way to put all of those resources to work.

by Jim Miesle on Sep 29, 2011 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

2 sentence game previews

I bet an intern does those for them.

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Seriously

Just throw darts next time.

Pitt couldn’t get into the endzone in the first half despite several short fields.

by Huck Finn on Sep 29, 2011 10:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

From H&R FanPost titled, "Why do you hate Notre Dame?"
Notre Dame only has three more wins than Purdue since 1997.

Yeah, if you count the following as wins:

Ball State, Rice, Central Florida (when they sucked), Central Michigan, Kent State, Illinois State, Western Michigan, Indiana State, Miami (OH), Toledo, Eastern Illinois, Norther Colorado, and Western Illinois.

Why is Purdue the little brother?

Because Notre Dame has won .671% of the games against you.

Because even during this “terrible” down period of Irish football since 1997, the Irish are still 9-5 (.642%) against you.

Because you’ve won one game inside Notre Dame Stadium in 37 years.

Because it’s been almost 40 years since you beat a legitimately good Notre Dame team.

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 29, 2011 10:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Won't post my prediction until tomorrow, but

suffice it to say, it’ll look a lot like Big E’s. What I’m looking for in this game is for Rees to become comfortable with the set of plays he given now in hopes that, that will open it up a bit more.

We’ve touched on this before here (burger, I believe brought it up) on how the ND playbook is very small and that is conducive to breaking in a new QB. Well, I think Rees isn’t a “new” QB anymore and it’s time to add a few more pages to the playbook.

by jkra0512 on Sep 29, 2011 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

This preview is missing one thing...

…consistent with the last four weeks, you forgot to say this is a MUST WIN game for the Irish. Seriously though, I don’t see how we can lose this one, and if we do, we have real problems.

There is no reason this shouldn’t be a blow out at halftime and let Crist start the second half (or play mid-3d Q). We need to exorcise the don’t-know-how-to-win-big demon. I don’t think Purdue has the ability to pull any trickery like Pitt did, so this should be much more like MSU without as many good players.

by DenverIrish on Sep 29, 2011 12:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I know at least some people are thinking, hey last week was supposed to be a blowout of Pitt so I’m not getting my hopes up. Well…Purdue is not as good as Pitt. I thought Notre Dame COULD blow out Pitt last week, but I also knew that if they played poorly Pitt was more than capable of beating them. I do not feel the same way about Purdue. What was it, 5 turnovers against Michigan and still almost won in Michigan Stadium? Yeah, I don’t know what it would take for Purdue to actually win. 5 turnovers, three of which are brought back for TDs?

Seriously, this should be an ass-whipping defensively. Purdue’s best players are at RB? Beautiful, that plays right into Notre Dame’s strengths. If Terbush and Marve want to run around, they’ll run into the arms of guys like Fleming, Shembo, Lynch, Tuitt and Te’o. I don’t know what Notre Dame’s offense will do, as that’s been nosediving for two weeks and Rees is either a complete mess or back to normal after the game-winning drive a week ago. But even without a great offensive performance, I can’t imagine Purdue scoring many points.

By the way, I just wanted to get this off my chest. Over at Keith Arnold’s blog at NBC, some commenter said that Notre Dame has been “playing down to the level of its opponents.” Notre Dame has faced South Florida, Michigan, Michigan St. and Pittsburgh thus far, so spare me that idea. I know it’s frustrating watching this team make so many critical mistakes every week, but they’re not playing cupcakes either. USF and Michigan are currently ranked, Michigan St. won 11 games last year and Pitt will probably finish with 6 or 7 wins. They’re not playing directional schools like, oh, I don’t know, Purdue. Purdue even faced a directional FCS school. Well done!

by frank_grimes on Sep 29, 2011 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

So they are playing down to the level of 3 ranked teams?

That is sound logic if I ever heard it…just remember, don’t hate the hater

by Jim Miesle on Sep 29, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

They are playing down to their opponents' level, sometimes even below it

USF and Michigan are both ranked only because they beat Notre Dame. ND gave both of those games away through well documented mistakes.

If ND hadn’t played down to their opponent’s level through the first four games, they would have one each game by at least 10 points and be ranked in the top 10. Depressing

by Ron Appalus on Sep 29, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

This may be splitting hairs...

I don’t agree that they are playing down to their opponents level. To me, that implies that an observer of that game would think the teams were evenly matched. That is what we did with Pitt. It was a close game throughout, and thankfully we squeaked out a win. But look at USF, Michigan, and MSU. We did not play down to their level. We dominated throughout the game and then shot ourselves in the foot repeatedly with ridiculous turnovers. Anyone watching the game knew we were beating ourselves.

by DenverIrish on Sep 29, 2011 6:08 PM EDT reply actions  

ND played down to Pitt's level?

Maybe so, but after last night, maybe Pitt’s level is not as low as many thought.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Sep 30, 2011 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

It would certainly be great if, at the end of the season, we are looking back calling the Pitt win very impressive. In recent history, it has turned out that our wins have been less impressive than we thought (e.g., Pitt 2005); would love to see that change.

by DenverIrish on Sep 30, 2011 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

By the way, Pittsburgh, that team we all thought was so weak, beat the living hell out of USF tonight, with Ray Graham leading the way. What did Ray Graham do last week? He had one long run, and that’s it. Maybe that win at Pitt last week was a lot more impressive than we thought.

by frank_grimes on Sep 30, 2011 12:36 AM EDT reply actions  

It's looks that way

Is Pitt a lot more talented than we all thought?

They were missing their top O-linemen, the other best O-linemen got hurt very early in the game, and they were still pushing USF all over the place.

Backyard Brawl to settle the Big East this year?

Sky rockets in flight.

by Eric Murtaugh on Sep 30, 2011 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pitt definitely looked a lot different last night, and clearly Ray Graham is the key to the offense. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a redo on South Florida? Pitt put up nearly identical numbers in total offense (but had over 300 yds on the ground) and scored 44. That should have been about what the Irish put on the board without all the redzone TOs.

by Jim Miesle on Sep 30, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

One Foot Down Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_8102_small
Irish Football and Lost Sleep

Recent FanPosts

Small
Champ Sports condensed/offense-defense cut ups
Small
DaVaris Daniels Cited for Underage Drinking
Small
5 things we need to happen, to have a successful season
C-hurdle_small
Andrew Hendrix Should Start in 2012
Small
College Football Stadium Tour: Michigan Stadium
81375450_small
Off Topic, But Help Me Out
Notre_dame_tradition_is_becoming_dangerously_out_of_control__28funny_cheerleader_picture_29_small
How Steve Bartman is the Cause of SEC Dominance
Nd_stadium_small_quality_small
Athlon Previews the 2012 Fighting Irish
Shamrock_small
Preseason BlogPoll Post-Spring Edition: What Do You Know?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE ONE FOOT DOWN STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Managers

Rocket1_small Eric Murtaugh

Nd_stadium_small_quality_small whiskey OFD

Editors

Jj_small Mouth of the South

Shamrock_small CW

Teo-vs_-service2_small burger23

Nd_national_champs_small Jim Miesle

Febreeze_small 4pointshooter