Brian Kelly Plays the Numbers 58+14+14=86
I can’t tell you how good it feels to be jumping back into the discussion here at One Foot Down. I have been on an OFD hiatus the last few months while I was out traipsing around the globe and having some adventures. I still owe many thanks to Eric Murtaugh and the rest of our crew here for executing the move over to SBN in my absence.
Now that I am back in the mix just in time for the 2011 season I figured there was no better way to get snapped back in than to take a hard look at the 2011 Fighting Irish Roster and the current recruiting cycle. Every year Notre Dame fans start asking “how many recruits can we take?” I will address that exact question in this post.
The bad news is that the staff is going to have to make some very tough decisions between now and February as we are already at the point where scholarships are no longer free. From this point forward every new commit will take a scholarship that another player will not be able to utilize for their 5th year of eligibility. The good news is that means we are officially back at the point where Notre Dame has a very healthy roster.
Before I go any further let me explain how I derive these numbers. Like many others I like to maintain my own eligibility chart which can be found at the link below.
There is a key at the bottom of the chart that explains how to read it. In short, I keep the players in columns with their original signing class. A # after a player’s name indicates that he will be eligible to apply for a 5th year of eligibility. Players in BOLD were 4-5 star recruits per rivals.com. Players in BLUE are those that I expect to see in the 2 deep this fall or at least see significant reps. Players in RED have already been ruled out for the 2011 season due to injury.
So what do we know? Let’s start with the current overall numbers per class.
24 Freshmen
19 Sophomores
15 Juniors
14 Seniors that are eligible to apply for a 5th year this spring
14 Current Commitments
86 TOTAL
So as of today Coach Kelly is already beyond the point where scholarships are free as he is capped at 85.
So all of this means what?
That as of today if all 14 of these commits sign LOI’s in February that 1 of those 14 current seniors that is eligible to apply for a 5th year will not be able to. There are obviously a few more position groups that will need some bulking up in this signing class so the number of players that don’t get the opportunity to play that 5th year is only going to increase.
My take on the priority to keep those players is reflected below from top to bottom. Thus if Coach Kelly were going to trim this roster tomorrow I would expect that he would do it from the bottom of this list up.
QB Dayne Crist
C Braxton Cave
DE Kapron Lewis-Moore
SS Jamoris Slaughter
NT Sean Cwynar
WR John Goodman
FS Dan McCarthy
C Mike Golic
OG Lane Clelland
DE Hafis Williams
NT Brandon Newman
ILB Anthony McDonald
ILB David Posluszny
WR Deion Walker
There are many factors tied to Crist but the bottom line is that if he wins the starting job this year and stays healthy his return is automatic. Unless of course he’s so good that he gets drafted….
Cave, KLM, Slaughter and Cwynar will also either start or see significant reps this fall and I expect their return to be relatively automatic as well. Goodman should also see a fair number of minutes this fall and will have the added benefits of Floyd graduating and relatively limited experience behind him. Keeping Goodman around for 2012 just makes sense. If Dan McCarthy can finally shake the injury bug and become a contributor this fall he will also be smart to keep due to the current lack of numbers at safety. Even if he isn’t a major contributor this fall I could see the staff keeping him around for 2012 while the handful of current safety commits get their sea legs.
I think the remaining 7 players on the list will most likely get bumped in favor of a new recruit. I still see interior offensive linemen (G/C) as positions of need in this class but I expect the staff to land at least two recruits there and bump both Mike Golic and Lane Clelland. I expect that Hafis Williams, Brandon Newman, Anthony McDonald and David Posluzny will all be victims of the quality depth in the classes behind them. As for Deion Walker I once had high hopes for him but I think his slot is already gone.
There are obviously many things that could happen between now and February that could change my outlook here. Breakout seasons, career ending injuries, off field issues, the NFL draft and last second changes of heart from a top line recruit could all come into play. But as of today I see this staff keeping those top 7 players for a 5th year and letting the lower 7 go. That means they could take another 6 in this current recruiting class for a total of 20.
Clear as mud?
In my opinion the position groups that need to be addressed with those next 6 spots are as follows.
Interior Offensive Linemen (C/G)- At least one true center here would be huge but I would like to see 2-3 C/G types with at least one having the ability to play center.
Running Back- No brainer
Inside Linebacker- One solid prospect here would be nice.
Tight End- This is one of those positions where I hate to see us skip a year.
Quarterback- I don’t typically like skipping a year on QB’s either but if Crist is going to come back for a 5th I think we will be fine. Picking up a top line recruit in the next cycle will then be a very high priority.
We will continue to update our eligibility chart and this discussion as we progress through the season. What are your thoughts as of today?
45 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Got a package in the mail today.
Thank you very much!

鳴かぬなら殺してしまえ、ほととぎす
Notre Dame Fighting Irish by birth and undergraduate degree
U. Hawaii Warrior because the government pays my grad school tuition
by Kelly's Gyros on Aug 11, 2011 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions
What are those cats doing?!?!?
I got a package yesterday too. Retro jersey+The Shirt. Football season is here!
I hope you enjoy the magazine.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 11, 2011 7:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, I GIS'd "happy dance"
so that’s what I’d assume they are doing. But they’re obviously in Japan, so you never know.
Yeah, we need to order “The Shirt”. Doesn’t matter that it’s “meh”, it’s what we do.
鳴かぬなら殺してしまえ、ほととぎす
Notre Dame Fighting Irish by birth and undergraduate degree
U. Hawaii Warrior because the government pays my grad school tuition
by Kelly's Gyros on Aug 11, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I really like The Shirt this year
I proudly wore it to the gym. The large fits me perfectly, which it didn’t last year.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 11, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm smaller than you and a medium fits me perfectly
I might say go large.
One Foot Down
On teh Twitterz
I'm 5'9" 165 and the large fits me perfectly.
I would recommend X-Large, but I would be worried because last year I got a Large and it was pretty big.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 11, 2011 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Really? I'm 5'11 160 and I think a large is too big for me
But I kinda like my shirts to be on the tighter side.
One Foot Down
On teh Twitterz
I really thought it fits perfectly
Not too big, not too small. Just right.
It wouldn’t surprise me if there is a variation in the sizing.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 11, 2011 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
My thoughts...
As of right now I wouldn’t have McCarthy as high on the “trim list” as you do. If he actually makes an impact this year that could change, but I would probably put him down towards the bottom of the list. The numbers at safety aren’t great, but we’ll still be returning Motta and Slaughter, and that should give someone like Hardy and another youngster an additional year to grow until they are called on to see the field on a regular basis. I just wouldn’t bring back someone who hasn’t done anything over three years so far.
Since we evidently passed up on Schutt and the staff thinks our numbers at NG/DT are fine, I would think Hafis is coming back. He played quite a bit last year, so unless he is kept on the sidelines because Cwynar and Nix are doing everything, he’s probably likely to come back I think.
Goodman is an interesting case. I hate to say it, but I think Kelly wants to re-mold the receiving corps and he’s not coming back—-pending a season in which he is legitimately pushing for a starting spot or a legitimate threat as a fourth option. Kelly does like numbers at receiver, and I’m sure he’s still not excited about the depth there, but Daniels, Greenberry, Ferguson, possibly another recruit, plus GA3 possibly moving back—-that’s a lot of toys to work with in addition to the other players.
Due to the coaches praise of Golic recently and the fact that there’s no other center besides Cave, I’d lean towards him coming back too.
McDonald is another one who might have a chance, but he needs to stay healthy.
Right now, I’d bring back: Crist, Cave, Kap, Slaughter, and Cwynar—-with Golic and Hafis pending on how the depth at their positions develop this season.
Welcome back, buddy!
Sky rockets in flight.
Generally agree with Eric
I profess no specific expertise on how many FS and SS you necessarily need on a roster at a given time point, but it seems that the only real argument you can make re: McCarthy being back next year, unless he makes a huge impact on the field this season, is that Slaughter and Motta will fight it out at SS and there’s not enough depth at FS. It seems more plausible to me that they bring Slaughter back and slot him as the starting FS and perhaps cross-train or entirely move one of the incoming freshmen over to FS.
Regarding depth at center: I thought I read something about Heggie taking snaps at center. Did anyone else read that (it also says as much in Whiskey’s roster link above)? Also, aren’t they planning on training one of the younger guys at center (e.g. Nick Martin)? Wouldn’t that be a better long-term plan in terms of building depth behind Cave, rather than bringing back Golic, who is the same year as Braxton and (similar to Eric’s argument regarding McCarthy) has made little impact on the field, to my knowledge?
I think you have a point about Golic and the youngsters
But I’m not sure I’d trust Heggie—-a serious project if there ever was one with very little experience on the O-line—-to step in and take over the task of running the offense with the QB in the spread if Cave is injured next year.
Certainly someone else from the underclassmen will likely move to center or cross-train there, but I would bet on Golic coming back. We’ll see.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 10, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah I would think Heggie is a bit of an expirament at Center
That said I would really enjoy the hell out of it if he ever turns out to be a factor. He is after all an RKG cult hero.
Chris Watt did a little cross training at Center in fall camp last year but then I never really heard much about that again.
With the way that Kelly moves the OL around it is tough to get a true handle on the two deep. Bottom line he’s going to figure out a way to get the best 5 guys out there. There are most likely other offensive linemen doing a little cross training at Center that we haven’t even heard of yet.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 10, 2011 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions
No chance they bring in a TE or a QB. 2RBs are a must, one more on the OL ,WR, DB, OLB/DE or both. That’s six or seven. I could see as many as eight, depending on who it is.
No worries
Just happy to see that you followed us over here and are still knee deep in the discussion.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 10, 2011 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Mostly Agreed
I think Crist is a no-brainer and if he values his NFL stock, he’d come back next year. (If he can stay healthy!)
I can see Mike Golic, Lane Clelland, Hafis Williams, Brandon Newman, Anthony McDonald, David Posluszny and Deion Walker all not on the team next year because all but one of those positions (Center) have younegr guys coming up with more potential.
I think it’s a 50/50 possibility that McCarthy gets his 5th year, which hinges on whether he can stay on the field consistently!
If Crist has a monster year
it makes little sense for him to return as his stock will go no higher and he will just increase the possibility of getting hurt. Andrew Luck is an aberration.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Aug 11, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Love the discussion
Thanks to all for the warm welcome back. I am stoked that I made it back in time for the season!
My favorite thing about this specific discussion is that it always highlights just how complex these decisions are for the staff. Every commit they take going forward is going to have a ripple effect somewhere on the roster. It is pretty wild to think that a guy like McDonald could lose his shot at a 5th year in favor of a new recruit but it is what it is. I don’t envy the coaching staff on having to make those decisions.
Eric- your thoughts on Goodman bring up an interesting point that I thought of but didn’t mention. I would be curious to know on what level if any Kelly wanting to get “his guys” in there plays into his decision process. We will never know the answer to that question but it could play into this at some level.
tlndma- Great to see you are still with us here. You always enhance the discussion.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
Not so fast, TLNDMA
i used that twain quote like two weeks ago—though I think we both misquoted it.
Mouth Of The South
by Mouth of the South on Aug 10, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Awesome.
Do your thing. See you in a few weeks.
I have nothing to ask but that you would remove to the other side, that you may not, by intercepting the sunshine, take from me what you cannot give.
Only room for RKGs
I think Kelly getting “his guys” in there plays a large part. On one hand, he will be happy to use someone else’s recruits that fully buy into his system, but if they don’t fit the position he wants then it limits his offense. I don’t see Goodman getting another year unless he has an outstanding year this year. We can find someone else with sure hands who can fair catch a punt. Also, if Kelly can get another good WR in the current class, I think Goodman is definitely gone.
This is an interesting analysis, and it is exciting to finally have this kind of depth.
The quality depth is definitely there
It wasn’t that long ago that we were all just wishing we could get back to having 85 players on scholarship.
I do agree that to some extent Kelly getting his guys in there has to play into this a little bit. These guys that are potentially on the fence are going to have to both produce and go all in as team players if they haven’t already.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 10, 2011 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Welcome Back Whiskey!
Love these posts. Your Roster Breakdown is an invaluable resource for depth chart debates throughout the season. A few points for your consideration:
(1) Trying to categorize OL depth into OT/OG/C may be a pointless exercise, as there’s so much cross-training. Who would have guessed we’d see Hegarty getting reps at OG? I recall reading that N. Martin and Hanratty are likely to see reps at C, but I don’t recall Heggie being in that conversation. And Harrell projects as an inside lineman for us.
(2) Niklas is getting his first look at OLB.
(3) I’d categorize Day as a DE, since the staff recruited him for 3-5 tech. The rest of your NT column looks good, since those guys are primarily 0-3 tech.
As has been mentioned already, there’s probably a strong presumption in favor of replacing Weis recruits with Kelly’s own guys, so unless you’re a starting senior who plays at a position of need, you’re probably not coming back. The general consensus seems to be Crist, Cave, Cwynar, KLM, and Slaughter are all most likely to get 5Ys. After that, every other senior will require an outstanding 2011 performance to make it back.
Hafis might get asked back as a SDE; otherwise it’s Tuitt > Day > Hounshell or Schwenke. Golic, Jr. might as well, but I think it’s more likely that one of the freshman distinguishes himself at C this year and becomes the #2; after all, Golic’s eligibility would run out with Cave’s, so Kelly may prefer to get a younger guy in the mix.
I wouldn’t count on getting 2-3 further interior linemen. More likely 1-2 blue chip OTs; the best OL all play OT in high school, and Kelly just moves them inside when necessary to get his best 5 on the field.
I wouldn’t count on an ILB either, though Baratti could easily end up at that position.
No QB or TE; potential transfers are already a concern with so much talent and depth at both of those positions.
2 RB, 1 WR, 1-2 OL, 1 DE, 1 OLB, 1-2 DBs.
Hey thanks Whiskeyjack
Concur on #1. It is definitely tough with the way that Coach Kelly moves the OL around to get the best guys on the field. I’m always digging around trying to figure out who is playing G/T/C. Trying to keep up can be futile!
I just saw the Niklas to OLB thing too. Made me wonder if that is a staff expirament to potentially get Lynch, Tuitt, Ishaq and Niklas all on the field at the same time down the road. It will be interesting to watch.
You are most likely correct on Day as well.
I will be very interested to see how this recruiting class ultimately shakes out. Strangely I am a lot less concerned about it than I have been in the recent past…. I feel good about the present and the future. I think we are on the cusp of a very good era of Notre Dame Football.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 11, 2011 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Welcome back, Whiskey
Nice way to inaugurate your new season.
Whiskeyjack and I are in agreement on most points. “Remolding” is the key term. I see Kelly and Co recruiting athletic, mobile OTs and converting them to interior lineman. As he said, “the best OL all play OT in high school, and Kelly just moves them inside when necessary to get his best 5 on the field.”
C can be taught as with Eric Olsen, who beat out the true C from h.s., Dan Wenger. With enough depth, which we have now, the Irish are not forced to recruit a specific OL position. This coaching staff can teach the positions.
Hanratty and Carrico are destined to be interior OL. One of Hegarty, N Mart, and Prestwood will switch inside, too. Harrell (2012) will be an interior lineman. I’d take two more OL recruits for 2012 – one for the interior and one OT. Depending on DL commits, Hounshell too could end up on the OL.
Interesting that the staff preferred Day to Schutt, who would have been a more natural NT, and that’s probably indicative of building some flexibility in their schemes as well as the eligibility chart at NT. I am not ready to put Springmann there as a 6’6" NT.
The remolding continues on the DL, which will have a true NT for some schemes, but have enough hybrid DE/DTs at 300# for 4-3 schemes. Niklas with 4.7 speed would be ideal for covering TEs and RBs. Does he have enough speed for OLB? Diaco is going to have fun moving these guys around.
Do you have a scholarship to give Schmidt, who came with Preferred Walk-on status, or Badger?
by Michael Collins on Aug 10, 2011 3:10 PM EDT reply actions
Well said, Michael.
Regarding our DL, we only really play three types: SDE and WDE (who play 3-5 tech) and pure DTs (who play 0-3 tech). Even in our 4-front looks, we only ever have 1 pure DT on the field at a time; the other “DT” is a SDE flanked by the Cat OLB. In 2012, we’ll have Cwynar, Nix, Stockton, Springmann (and maybe Hafis) at DT. That’s more than adequate depth for the position, so I doubt we’ll miss Schutt.
Day, on the other hand, was reportedly recruited as a 3-5 tech SDE. I expect he’ll be the #2 behind Tuitt in 2012.
Kelly mentioned today that Schwenke is up to 296 lbs! I’m really hoping Niklas excels at Cat OLB; after Flemming graduates, Ishaq is the only natural fit for the position.
I don’t see how Schmidt gets a scholarship this year. We’re still in the hunt for lots of blue chip recruits (most of which happen to be visiting for the USC game), and 5-7 seniors who will demand 5Ys.
Toma says hi and agrees
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now."
"Curioufer and curioufer"
by Cranked_Irish on Aug 10, 2011 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Michael good point on Olsen and Wenger
Also very good points on the OTs that you expect to see moving inside.
I’m just assuming that Badger falls into this current recruiting class and gets a schollie. I accounted for him that way in the numbers. It would definitely raise some debate on whether or not it was the right thing to do if he didn’t get one.
Great to hear from you.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 11, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions
This is a nice problem to have
I’m sure the staff hates having to make these types of decisions, but it’s better than being under the limit and worrying about converting a running back to linebacker.
One Foot Down
On teh Twitterz
Call me crazy...
but I see 6 5th years max. Too many guys on that list have to have phenomenal 2011s to get asked back. Throw in a transfer or two (which is inevitable once the depth chart shakes out) and the recruiting class probably ends up at 21 or 22 (max).
At this point, Golic has to be in that group that comes back unless someone else really steps up at C this fall to back up Cave.
No TEs or QBs this cycle. I don’t think they are missing on TE if they don’t take one, since they only lose Ragone from the rotation, and Eifert-Welch-Koyack-Jake Golic should provide more than enough depth for 2012.
Assuming they get 7 more in this class, I have to think there is 1-2 RB, 1 WR, 1 OL, 1 DE, 1 S, 1 LB or something similar to that. The flexibility that BK and company are recruting cannot be understated at this point.
Jim that's a great point on the overall flexibility
of the kids that the staff has focused on landing. It kind of falls right in with that whole player development thing that comes up from time to time too. I like this coaching staff.
Good point on the QBs and TEs. I fully admit that my overly organized and OCDish brain sometimes gets the best of me when I see blank cells on the spreadsheet at those two positions! If we skip on those positions this year though they both need to be at the top of the list for the next recruiting cycle. Having no QBs or TEs in the 2012 class should help land some top flight recruits there.
Thanks for the comment.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/
by whiskey OFD on Aug 11, 2011 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions
A question.
I know the Irish have like 6 to 7 openings left for the 2012 class and they have a lot of high 4* and 5 * offers out. If BK only gets 2 or 3 of those elite players will he just fill the class with his so-called second choices or let it ride till 2013 and take a large class?
That's a tough question.
I think Kelly is going to be able to fill the rest of the class with 6 or 7 four-star or higher players because the team will play well during the season. But I’m sure he has his eye on some other three-star guys too that he can add if he wants.
My inclination is that he wants to address any and all depth concerns as soon as possible. That gives him more flexibility and more of a focus on next year’s class. That likely means filling up this class as big as possible—-with the assumption he has a good idea how many 5th year guys he wants coming back.
Sky rockets in flight.
by Eric Murtaugh on Aug 11, 2011 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Crist is coming back
So far his career consists of:
3-4 games as a barely adequate backup to Clausen
5-6 games as a good but not great starter in a new offensive system
and, let’s not forget…
TWO MAJOR KNEE INJURIES
Let’s say he has a great year, Irish go 11-2 and win a BCS bowl game – that’s great! His draft stock will be a lot higher than it is now. But he won’t be the #1 QB on the board (that will be Andrew Luck), and likely won’t be #2 or #3 or #4 – he’d be looking at a mid-2nd round ceiling. Why?
With two caveats: if Kelly wants him, and if he wants to be a #15 or better NFL draft pick.
1) At this point he will only have a season and a half as a starter, and only one season in which he managed to not have his knee spontaneously explode.
2) Two major knee injuries. It’s worth repeating
3) The relative flame-out of both Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in the NFL. This SHOULDN’T count against Dayne (both were drafted into absolutely terrible situations, and frankly Brady lacks a true NFL arm, and neither have a lot in common with Crist), but it will.
Crist’s only hope of being a top-half of the 1st round NFL draft pick is to play good to great, injury free, college football for the next two years.
Wow, I really made a mess of this post.
“With two caveats: if Kelly wants him, and if he wants to be a #15 or better NFL draft pick.” should be at the top.
Arithmentic
Have you accounted for the Mormon who did not play and went away on a 2 year mission?
by Geoffrey Hui '73 on Aug 11, 2011 8:47 PM EDT reply actions
I did account for Chris Badger
I just listed him as a member of the current recruiting class as his elibility will start with the rest of the current recruits next year. That’s why I have 14 current recruits vice the 13 that you see on the front page of our site.
Whiskey
http://www.onefootdown.com/

by 

















