Pre-Spring Depth Chart: Tight End
We are inching ever closer to the quarterback position, but up first we have the tight ends.
If you’ve missed any of the other positions so far, clink on the names below.
*Denotes fifth year eligibility
Mike Ragone, Fifth year
Tyler Eifert, Junior*
Jake Golic, Junior*
Alex Welch, Sophomore*
Ben Koyack, Freshman
Will the Irish Be Able to Replace Kyle Rudolph’s Production?
Without a doubt, yes.
Rudolph was a physical specimen and very talented in his own right, but in the grand scheme of things his production over his career wasn’t that great. Of course injuries played a major part in that, but nevertheless the team doesn’t have to replace that many receptions or touchdowns.
Just think about it…Rudolph never caught more than 33 balls in a season or totaled more than 364 yards in a season. As the starter for seven games in 2010, Tyler Eifert put up 27 receptions and 352 yards.
That’s not to say that he is more talented or better than Rudolph, but if Eifert can stay healthy there should be an increase in production.
Also, we have to factor in some production from any of the other backups who should catch a few balls along the way in the fall. You’ll notice that from 2008 to 2009 it was either Rudolph catching balls or the tight end position was essentially dead from a receiving stand point.
With a few up and coming young tight ends and a veteran fifth year senior, there should be a lot of production from this position.
How Much Will the Underclassmen Play?
As it stands right now seven months before the season, I would say that Ben Koyack is going to redshirt and add a little bulk to his frame.
He may be the most physically gifted tight end on the roster, but there are a handful of bodies ahead of him right now and I’m not sure it would be worth putting Koyack in there if he’s only going to see the bare minimum of minutes.
Alex Welch is an interesting case and his playing time might depend on what Kelly decides to do with Mike Ragone.
Will Ragone be used primarily as a blocker and will that allow Welch to backup Eifert as the receiving tight end of the group?
Or will Welch have to fight Ragone (and possibly Golic) for minutes in non-blocking situations?
We could probably see a little of both scenarios, in which case Welch should probably get some quality playing time but nothing too overwhelming.
Until we see how he shapes up in relation to the other tight ends, it should be assumed that Koyack will redshirt.
Who Needs to Step Up?
This is a tough question because there really is a lot of stability and depth at tight end and no pressing need for someone to fill a starting or primary backup position.
You could argue that Ragone needs to bring leadership and blocking, or that Welch needs to make some sort of an impact, but at the end of the day it is all about Eifert taking over as the main man in the passing game.
Losing Rudolph hurts, but it appears that Eifert is going to be a legitimate star and one of the better tight ends in the country. He is tall, with a lean muscular frame, and proved he has good speed and playmaking ability down the stretch last year.
The high praise Brian Kelly heaped on Eifert during fall practice last year probably signals that he’ll be a force for years to come.
What’s the Lineup Going to Look Like?
Eifert should start and play a lot of minutes, coming out to take a breather or give someone else a chance to block on third and short and other similar plays.
Eifert is actually a pretty good blocker so he could play a ton of minutes if he stays healthy enough and can still get open down field without slowing down.
I tabbed Ragone as my breakout player of the year for 2010…and that didn’t work out too well.
Nonetheless, he’s probably the team’s best pound for pound blocker and has shown glimpses that he can be a really good tight end at this level.
I know some people have written Ragone off because of his problems off the field and questioned why he was brought back for a fifth year, but he really is talented and no one should be surprised if he hauls in 20 receptions in 2011 and makes a big impact.
Welch will probably be in the mix somehow, but I don’t foresee anything greater than a 10-catch season and some spot duty blocking late in games.
Jake Golic was actually a better prospect out of high school than people remember, but I’m not sure he’ll ever be a regular in the tight end rotation. He does have three years of eligibility left, so there is plenty of time to make some noise in his career.
Down the road Ben Koyack should be the number one guy and a big part of this offense, but he may have to bide his time throughout 2011 while other veterans eat up all the minutes.
Will these players live up to the "Tight End U" moniker?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m very skeptical of Ragone. Between the injuries, the off-field problems, and his penchant for dropping passes in crunch time, I don’t expect anything more than solid blocking out of him; I hope I’m wrong.
2011 is Golic’s window of opportunity. If Welch or Koyack pass him, he may never see significant minutes in his career.
Welch or Koyack could play a big role if Eifert gets injured, but I agree that Welch probably sees modest action and Koyack red-shirts if all goes to plan.
I’m very pleased with the solid depth at TE.
by Whiskeyjack on Feb 16, 2011 4:22 PM EST reply actions
We have nice depth and can hopefully stay free from injuries, transfers and ResLife at TE. Ragone is probably back for blocking, but to also make sure Koyack has a redshirt year.
by Michael Collins on Feb 16, 2011 7:26 PM EST reply actions
It probably makes sense to try and retain a year of eligibility for Koyack. Rudolph was the exception in many ways. He looked like an upperclassmen the moment he stepped on campus due to his work prior to coming to ND.
I have to agree with Whiskey, 2011 is Golic’s window. If he doesn’t show much, then he gets buried on the depth chart. Ragone will probably be used mostly as a blocking TE, much like last year. To me, its either Welch or Golic that need to develop into a solid back-up for Eifert. Golic has a similar frame, while Welch is probably closer to Ragone. I would be happy with either one playing well, so that it gives some versatility in formations and packages (imagine a power look in the red zone from which you can motion/move both TEs wide—can you say mismatch?)
by Jim Miesle on Feb 17, 2011 8:38 AM EST reply actions
I think you can definitely do some fun things with two tight ends out there in the spread offense. Especially with them being good receivers, it should be more common that the team goes out in a power formation and either tries to run the ball or kicks one of the tight ends out for a pass.
I’m still waiting for that nifty tight end pitch that they ran during last year’s Blue-Gold game. I love that play!!
by Eric Murtaugh on Feb 17, 2011 10:02 AM EST reply actions
All these guys are good althetes & I’d love to see as many of them make an impact as possible, but I’m kinda rooting for Ragone to make a nice impact this year. Yes, he’s currently heralded mostly for his good blocking, but if I remember right, out of HS that kid was highly regarded for his speed (pre-knee-injury) & pass-catching ability. Definitely has dropped a couple important passes though; no question that that won’t cut it.
It’d be pretty fun to see Kelly trot out a 3-4 TE formation next year, practically screaming “we’re gonna run it,” only to shift them all out wide io run routes & catch some LB’s flat-footed.
Eric, what was the TE pitch play from the B&G game? I don’t remember it. But speaking of sweet plays, I’m a sucker for the TE throw-back (especially near the Red Zone): OL & QB all slide one direction after the snap, moving the pocket. The TE stays w/ them like he’s gonna block, then slips out in the opposite direction. Seems like it ALWAYS catches the defense off guard & leaves the TE wide open for a TD grab.
Damn… is it really 7 months till football? Sigh…
by baIrish on Feb 17, 2011 2:00 PM EST reply actions
baIrish,
7 months…indeed, but one more until we get spring practice to hold us over.
The play I’m thinking about, they ran a read option, faked the hand off to the running back…then the QB took a step or two and pitched to the tight end coming across the line of scrimmage behind the offensive line. I think it was Ragone and he took the ball up the middle for a nice gain.
I don’t remember the particular details but it was something like that and I loved it.
by Eric Murtaugh on Feb 17, 2011 2:21 PM EST reply actions
Ragone still has good speed for a TE post knee injury. If you remember, he was the one that ran down the Washington State player trying to convert the blocked PAT into 2 from behind. It would be nice to see him have one big game (like Kamara vs. Utah) in 2011. Say what you want, but it shows a lot of desire and want-to to bounce back from injuries and off-field issues and still be a productive member of the team.
by Jim Miesle on Feb 17, 2011 4:06 PM EST reply actions
Great summary Eric. Thanks for the honest evalution. ND will lose nothing in production from losing Rudolph. If he had stayed he could have become a legend, but his leaving early prevented him from acquiring that kind of status. As you said, in the grand scheme of things his production over his career wasn’t that great, or irreplaceable. I loved Kyle and wish he would have stayed. We will be fine, if not better at tight end. In the grand scheme, he will have the money, but he lost out on All-American and legendary status.
by Johnnypf34 on Feb 18, 2011 11:13 AM EST reply actions
@Johnnpf34:
He’s a prodigious talent and an athletic freak, but was also plagued by injury throughout his college career. That’s why his production wasn’t that great.
Having a chance to get drafted in the first round despite his injury-prone history, Rudy absolutely made the right decision in jumping early. If his senior season had been cut short by yet another injury, his stock would have dropped precipitously.
by Whiskeyjack on Feb 18, 2011 6:02 PM EST reply actions
Joey Hiben, Konrad Reuland, Will Yeatman and Joseph Fauria – where are you now?
Hiben stayed for a year at ND in architecture, then transferred to Minnesota where he tried to walk on. Reuland transferred to Stanford, was honorable mention all-Pac-10 this year and is rated 40th among all TEs for the NFL Draft. Yeatman transferred to Maryland, played on their nationally ranked lacrosse team and the football team and is rated 24th among all TEs for the NFL Draft. Fauria transferred to UCLA, was a sophomore last year, and last year caught three receptions for 21 yards and 2 TDs for the season.
Rudolph is the unanimous #1 TE for the NFL draft. Ragone, if he had come out, was ranked the 20th best TE for the draft.
by Michael Collins on Feb 19, 2011 12:20 PM EST reply actions
1. Eifert
2. Welch
3. Koyack
eventually Koyack gets to no.2, maybe eventually #1. both Welch and Koyack were top 3 TEs (koyack #1). Ragone has been a disappointment- #2 TE 4.4-4.5 speed not sure what he can bring to the table
by chris on Feb 23, 2011 6:59 AM EST reply actions
Koyack is a super long shot to start, the odds aren’t great he’s even a backup.
Ragone is a great blocker, he’s the oldest, and he is still a decent pass catcher. He’s going to play a lot…I don’t see Kelly bringing him back if he’s going to sit on the bench.
by Eric Murtaugh on Feb 23, 2011 8:58 AM EST reply actions
I’m not disagreeing with anything you’ve said, except that Rudy absolutely made the right decision to jump early. Financially, most likely. We’ll never know. Accomplishment wise, highly unlikely, but again, we’ll never know. The question asked was “Will the Irish be able to replace Kyle Rudolph’s production?” I was commenting on Eric’s honest and accurate evaluation that ND has already done that, and should see even more production from the position this season. You reinforced that yourself by stating Kyle’s injuries prevented him from having the production he could have had, but ultimately, never had. Unfortunately, we will never find out how good he could have been. GO IRISH!!
by Johnnypf34 on Feb 23, 2011 12:24 PM EST reply actions
I expect Ragone to be a very good blocker and a factor in the passing game as well (if he stays healthy).
by pablo on Feb 24, 2011 1:24 AM EST reply actions
I also can’t get Ragone’s B-G performance out of my head from last year either. He looked like a bona fide All-American, and was playing at such a high level.
by Eric Murtaugh on Feb 24, 2011 12:07 PM EST reply actions

by 
















