Could USC Sanctions Impact Notre Dame?
As a Notre Dame fan I am naturally predisposed to root against USC in all endeavors. It is just part of the deal.
In my younger days I tended to see such things in extremes. It was black and white, good versus evil and there were lines in the sand. Fortunately I have mellowed out quite a bit over the years. Adulthood and real responsibility tend to bring a little more perspective on things. But I still can’t stand USC.
I was at the Coliseum in 2002 on the night that Carson Palmer cut up the Irish defense in the second half en-route to winning the Heisman. As I watched Straight Outta L.A. on the WWL last night they were talking about the Raider fans being completely out of control I had flashbacks to that night in 2002. The Trojan fans were the worst I have ever seen at a college football game. Little did I know that the beat down I witnessed on the field and in the stands that night was only the beginning. It has been rough watching the Irish get worked over by the Trojans for the last several years. In all honesty the Pete Carroll era is something I would rather forget.
When the NCAA started digging into the Trojan program I was initially excited. Like most other Irish fans I thought it was long overdue. As of today it looks like we might find out what punishment the NCAA has in store for the Trojans by the end of the month.
My natural inclination is to hold out hope that the NCAA delivers a nice off season surprise and drops the hammer on Troy. It is the right thing to do. As great as that sounds another thought shortly follows. Could the ripple effect of a harsh penalty for the Trojans actually have a negative impact on Notre Dame? There are a lot of angles here.
Carroll and his fast and loose program have painted the NCAA into a corner. No matter what spin the NCAA tries to put on a wrist slap the perception will be that the Trojans got a pass just because they are a power player. Everything about that is bad for college football as a whole. That said that is what I see as the most likely scenario. I will be surprised if the penalty is anything more than vacating some wins, which is meaningless in this scenario, and the loss of a handful of scholarships.
But on the off chance that the NCAA actually did deliver a severe enough penalty to really derail the USC program what does it mean for the Fighting Irish? Does it really matter? It could.
Notre Dame is fighting to stay independent in the midst of inevitable conference realignment that could make scheduling extremely difficult. An independent Notre Dame could find it even more difficult to navigate the schedules and TV contracts of the superconferences to find quality matchups. The scheduling of teams like Western Michigan and Tulsa has already drawn the ire of Irish fans but could become more the norm than the exception. The upside is that I don’t think 7-4-1 would be sustainable in that environment. To schedule additional quality opponents more home and home deals become a must.
Traditional rivalries with USC and Michigan will have to be maintained and gain importance in that kind of environment. While the current 2010 schedule is littered with several respectable 8-4 type teams we all know that polls and the BCS love big wins against top tier opponents. With no conference championship game to rely on as a kick save those quality opponents have to be scheduled.
Assuming that traditional rivalry games with Michigan and USC are able to be maintained it benefits Notre Dame for those teams to carry as much weight as possible in the polls. The immediate future of Michigan is very much in doubt at the moment which leaves USC. Should the Trojans tank due to NCAA sanctions Athletics Director Jack Swarbrick could find himself staring at a very mediocre strength of schedule.
This is where having sacrificed the ability to schedule another two high quality home and home deals in favor of 7-4-1 comes back to bite you. The fate of USC could actually have an impact.
The whole scenario creates a perfect storm where Brian Kelly could theoretically get the Irish playing championship caliber football again only to have no shot at actually playing for a championship. There was a time when I thought that was impossible, but I don’t see it that way anymore.
Many said that the hiring of Brian Kelly would define the tenure of Jack Swarbrick as Athletics Director. I am beginning to think his real tests have yet to come. What do you think?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m not as worried about the Trojans as you. ND has certainly played mediocre football this past decade and it hasn’t hurt Troy’s stature at all. Heck, even LSU clobbering us back in the ’05 season bowl game got Jamarcus Russell first pick status, and our D was terrible statistically. To your point, Palmer won the Heisman against a back-peddling Irish squad and the voters didn’t care. To sum: if everyone thinks your good, they’ll think you’re good regardless of the schedule.
Conference realignment does worry me, however. Teams tying up future schedules years in advance with extra conference games because, well, there are more teams in their respective conferences to schedule could make things really complicated. However, there’s a simple fix for that: drop the stupid 7-4-1 plan, and publicly announce the teams we want to schedule a level playing field "home-and-away" series against: traditional powers. Let everyone know we want a piece of Texas, Miami, Nebraska, FSU, Alabama, Florida and Ohio State. Some of these teams are great right now. Some are struggling. That could change in 5 years. So sign ‘em up. Keep USC and Michigan. If we find ourselves a year when those two schools and, say, Miami, are all on our schedule and are all top 10, then… kick a$$ and win the title game. No championship taint there. How many top 5 teams did ND defeat in ’88? Three! Michigan was top 10 that season, as well. That’s four huge games.
Publically call them out, and sign ‘em up I say. Schools’ appetite for money and ego will force them to put pen to paper, and with every signoff our independence is strengthened.
by Baity on May 13, 2010 9:49 AM EDT reply actions
What good for football is good for ND. USC must be punished in proportion to the violation or the entirety of college football becomes degraded by double standards, cheats and general loss of confidence. This effects ND much more than “strength of schedule.” Shame on all those willing to look the other way for there own personal gains!
by Valpodoc on May 13, 2010 12:52 PM EDT reply actions
Baity great comment. I agree that the real issue this highlights is 7-4-1. With another 1-2 top tier programs on the sked it matters much less if USC goes into the tank. Valpo I’m with you on th integrity of the game perspective as well. They should get hammered. I just don’t think they will. The next year is going to be very interesting for all ND supporters.
by Whiskey on May 13, 2010 1:23 PM EDT reply actions
I truly believe that all of the hype about the development of three or four super conferences, and tied to that the likelihood of ND joining the Big Ten, is just that. Hype.
If the circumstances dictate that is the best move for Notre Dame, it will happen. What ND supporters think most likely will not matter. Most of us want ND to retain its independent status, but it may not.
Some have said that it isn’t about money. That is absurd. It is about money, and in the final analysis that may well drive the decision.
All of us need for football to begin. It is indeed a long summer until September 4.
GO IRISH!
by Ted on May 13, 2010 1:47 PM EDT reply actions
ND is the only team in the country that, regardless of strength of schedule, gets a BCS bowl game with 3 losses or less, and gets a serious look at the national title game with two. Reference the last year with Brady Quinn.
by Dimes on May 13, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions
Ted September 4th is entirely too far away. Dimes Notre Dame has always gone to the best bowl they are eligible for. Bottom line they sell tickets and turn on TV sets. But it isn’t written anywhere that it will always be that way. They still need to be smart and fix the scheduling to cover their six. It can be a blessing and a curse by the way. Going to the BCS in 2006 was great. Getting smacked by LSU not so great. At least Jamarcus Russel got a big payday out of it.
by Whiskey on May 13, 2010 3:43 PM EDT reply actions
I was at the 2002 game also with my family and a friend who is a priest, who was wearing his collar. We took him as a thank you for a recommendation he had written for my application to Notre Dame. The USC fans were out of control. It was actually a scary experience. One SC fan behind us kept screaming that anyone who liked notre dame was a f@ggt. Another, who clearly didnt go to USC, tried to pick a fight with me in the bathroom (He was in his 30s, I was 17). To top it all off, on our way back to the seats at the half one fan threw a beer at the priest and yelled that he should start praying for Rudy to come save us. We ended up leaving in the third quarter and have never been back to the Colliseum, despite the fact that we live in LA.
by Henry on May 13, 2010 5:50 PM EDT reply actions
Henry it sounds like you were sitting in the same section that I was! They really are the worst fans I have ever seen. That was the one thing they left out of the 30 for 30 documentary on the Raiders. When they went back to Oakland their fans just started going to the USC games. Rough crowd to put it mildly.
by Whiskey on May 13, 2010 9:07 PM EDT reply actions
Can someone please explain 7-4-1? I assume it has to do with quality of opponent in some way.
by UT_06 on May 13, 2010 10:53 PM EDT reply actions
7-4-1 is the current scheduling model that Notre Dame is using. 7 home games, 4 true road games, and 1 “barnstorming/ off site” game that is also considered a home game as far as broadcast rights are concernced. As a result that off site game is also televised by NBC.
by Whiskey on May 14, 2010 6:05 AM EDT reply actions
Relax about the 7-4-1. If there is major conference realignment, things will change. If not, the 7-4-1 gives more ND fans a chance to see the team. The schedule isn’t perfect, but winning games is way more important. Ohio St, Mich St, Auburn, Texas A&M, and Kansas are all playing 8 home games this year. Texas, Va Tech and Florida are utilizing 7-4-1. Florida does this every year, and won’t play a home-and-home against any non conference foe except Fla St. If any of these teams is one of two undefeateds at the end of the year, they will be in the BCS championship game. As will an undefeated ND team.
by Uncle Beer on May 15, 2010 10:05 AM EDT reply actions
Uncle Beer I used to agree with you 100%. I just think ND needs to have 3-4 big name matchups on the schedule for additional security, and that is tough to do under 7-4-1. While an undefeated 2010 season could theoretically put the Irish in the title game I would be concerned that it might not based on the combination of their schedule and expected preseason ranking. That preseason ranking bit is a whole other discussion but it is what it is.
The 1 loss SEC champs are almost a lock at this point. The Big 12 and Big 10 champs will duke it out to face them and teams like Boise area wildcard. If there were 1-2 more upper crust teams on the sked I would like ND’s chances of getting a title shot. Without those big wins to hang your hat on though, more is left up to the pollsters.
So if you can maintain 7-4-1 and get another 1-2 big name teams on board no problem. But when teams like Western Michigan and Tulsa pop up on the sked it makes me think getting another 1-2 big name programs on board isn’t easy at the moment. If you can go to say 6-5-1 and offer two additional home and home deals it could make that a lot easier. I will be very interested tos see if the Miami series actually comes to fruition and whether or not ND can pull that off in the construct of 7-4-1. 2012 is sounding like it might be 6-5-1. We’ll see.
I guess what we are really talking about is risk vs. reward. Which scenario is more dangerous? Playing another 1-2 top tier opponents or leaving your fate to the pollsters after playing a blah schedule? It is a fun subject to discuss. Thanks for stopping by.
by Whiskey on May 15, 2010 5:44 PM EDT reply actions
What a nice post my friend. I am a facebook addict and mostly spend my time playing some playfish games and just chatting out with my colleages. Surely, there are so many ways we can use facebook and I really love using it. I hope they have something more new to come for all of us.
by Mary Stewart on Oct 24, 2010 3:02 AM EDT reply actions
Just stopping by to comment you for the great read. It was really worth my time reading this content. Waiting for more wonderful posts soon! I added your feed in my reader!
by Vinita Winker on Nov 3, 2010 5:39 AM EDT reply actions
это очень хорошая идея и я ее поддерживаю. Вообще, любюой человек с интересной историей может опубликоваться у меня, как это делают некоторый журналисты. Так что пишите мне на почту – договоримся.
by sethvu on Jan 19, 2011 10:33 PM EST reply actions
Couldn’t agree more Sethvu. Truly insightful. Aw, what am I saying—it’s all Greek to me.
by MouthOfTheSouth on Jan 19, 2011 11:46 PM EST reply actions

by 

















